It 'no use denying it, the strings are part of BDSM, so that the B stands for bondage, that the very act of binding. From a simple string that prevents the movement you can get to true art forms, whose exponents are the Japanese. Wandering through the network can be very intriguing photos and videos of women tied in a very imaginative, suspended, forced into unnatural positions altogether.
In reality, though drawn from a purely "aesthetic" from bondage, difficult to use strings in my sessions. But even handcuffs or ties of any kind. As with all things, my choice was the result of evolution. At the beginning not only tying the sub in the first meetings, to ensure that she is not afraid and that we could know in a calm and reassuring. Then, after adequate knowledge, inclusion of the part where she was tied up in whole or in part.
Over time, however, I realized that my understanding of the Dom / sub is not compatible with the fact that the subject is unable to move. Indeed, it is the fact that she bears pain and humiliation without be "forced" makes it more real and exciting.
What do I mean by that? Over time I realized that for the sub to be immobilized was almost a justification "unconscious" with themselves: I could not do anything because I could not move. Basically they said almost to himself that it was just their status to "compel". But I do not want that. My puppy must remain motionless with his mouth open when ordered to drink my own urine, or kneeling when eating my belt. But because it wants to, not because it is constrained by a rope. The bond must be stronger than the mental.
0 comments:
Post a Comment