Some people believe that BDSM has nothing to do with sex. Obviously those who think that BDSM is just a fuck session to "the strange Famo" did not understand anything. But even those who think that the two should not even be put in the same sentence has a somewhat 'original in the world. The Dom / sub is a relationship of absolute possession, physical and psychological. So even sexual possession. On the other hand, even humiliate and inflict pain to the sub is in itself rewarding, certainly can not give physical pleasure. I am convinced that Dom has not only the right but the duty to vent all her sexual fantasy on the sub.
More delicate is the subject of pleasure. Obviously an orgasm by the diver can "break the eggs in the basket of one session. Mind you, nothing prohibits it. Indeed it may well be some kind of prize give orgasm to a sub un'abnegazione for insurance premiums, or a particular strength in a given session. Another is it for granted. There is not and there should be nothing automatic. Surely if the Dom is not satisfied with his sub, but even if it is. And 'its power (and his only) to decide if the premium is deserved, or if not a higher premium does not have an orgasm to please the Lord of his life.
Generally, puppies "In heat", ie those who have not had a lot of orgasms are more ready to obey, to the wishes of the Sun Personally I've never done, but I was told that a chastity belt has some remarkable effects, since it makes more prolonged abstinence and impossible to avoid. A sub belt may be able to have orgasms too disruptive if not stimulated directly, even during the spanking.
No comments:
Post a Comment